Hi all, I think I may have encountered a bug but I'm not sure. For those who have been following my posts, this is still related to the sinusoidal corrugated structure made of an homogeneous block and a sinusoidal layer described by a material function (the structure description is pasted at the end of this post). Anyway, if I have the exact same gamma to both parts, let's say 0.0025, I obtain a very low Q, and lower freq:
harminv0:, frequency, imag. freq., Q, |amp|, amplitude, error harminv0:, 0.602134752256352, -0.00100575265694004, 299.345345051497, 2.25493610865117, -1.98000595188025-1.07903349559579i, 1.81790888260522e-13 than if I change slightly the gamma of one part to 0.00251 and keep the first one at 0.00250, I obtain a higher freq. and higher Q: harminv0:, frequency, imag. freq., Q, |amp|, amplitude, error harminv0:, 0.608291158834215, -4.43444712346758e-4, 685.870348543645, 2.12853339765018, 1.74906261311423-1.21302695778711i, 2.71903224397841e-13 This is for a cell with eps-averaging turned on and a resolution of 60. Is this a bug or a mistake? As for the feature request, I was wondering if it would be possible to describe flux region that would record the flux in an arbitrary direction described by a vector3. As of now, the directions are limited to X,Y, and Z. Thanks! Nic _______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
