On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Nicolas Tetreault wrote: > This is for a cell with eps-averaging turned on and a resolution of 60. Is > this > a bug or a mistake?
If you're not sure what is going on with harminv, the best thing to do is usually to run it again with a narrow-bandwidth source around the resonant frequency. Not only is harminv more accurate given a narrow-bandwidth source that just excites the mode of interest, but also this way you can look at the field pattern and try to understand what (if anything) has changed. (Most likely, harminv just wasn't converged properly in your case.) > As for the feature request, I was wondering if it would be possible to > describe flux region that would record the flux in an arbitrary > direction described by a vector3. As of now, the directions are limited > to X,Y, and Z. Thanks! You can do that now. Just add multiple flux regions recording the flux in the X, Y, and Z directions, and then add the results together weighted by the X/Y/Z components of a unit vector in your desired direction. _______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
