On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Jun She wrote:
> After the simulation with no-bend, the results recorded by these
> monitors are showed as below:
> flux1:, 0.1, 3.67071951055484e-5, 3.66314396752776e-5, 3.52896533218256e-5
> [...]
> The second column is the results recorded by the monitor located at the
> end of the waveguide. The third column is the results recorded by the
> monitor located at the center of the waveguide. The fourth column is the
> results recorded by the monitor located at the beginning of the
> waveguide.
>
> At the beginning of the results, the data of the fourth column is small
> than ones of the second column. Is it right?
I can't replicate your results. I used the bend-flux.ctl file
included with Meep and ran:
meep resolution=40 no-bend?=true bend-flux.ctl
The first few lines of the output are:
flux1:, 0.1, 3.66483634592317e-5, 3.70137012800535e-5
flux1:, 0.101010101010101, 5.57497590174288e-5, 5.62468998607047e-5
flux1:, 0.102020202020202, 8.41043092415777e-5, 8.47612941917774e-5
flux1:, 0.103030303030303, 1.25831624792546e-4, 1.26667452004467e-4
As you can see, the last column (the flux next to the source) is always
greater than the third column (the flux at the end of the waveguide), as
one might hope.
Steven
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
