Dear Steven and other meep users,
 
I have a slab structure which is air, silion and silicon dioxide from top to 
bottom. The structure has period on x direction, so I use PML boundary 
condition on y and z direction and periodic boundary condtion on x side. 
However, I found the magnitude of field is large inside PML. When the structure 
is 2D, i.e., the structure is homogenous along z direction,  PML boundary 
condition on y and periodic boundary condtion on x side is used, the result is 
good and is consistent with the result given by MPB. I think there is something 
wrong with cooperation with PML boundary condition and periodic boundary 
condtion in 3D, whereas this problem doesn't exist in 2D. I simulated a very 
simple structure, a block, to verify my expectation. When I use PML on every 
side, magnitude of field is very low inside PML. Magnitude is very larger 
inside PML when I use PML boundary condition on y and z direction and periodic 
boundary condtion on x side. How to deal with it?
 
Thank you in advance!
 
Young-Soo Lee


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to