Hey Ardavan,

thanks for your reply!
I reported an issue (#892
<https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/issues/892>), because I think I found
a bug still related to #687
<https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/issues/687>. Seems as if under certain
circumstances the D_conductivity still gets ignored. I was able to
reproduce my observation by means of the example code from this previous
bug. I didn't look at the epsilon itself, but how the actual fields
behaved - that's what I meant by "it seems as my material was transparent".

Best regards
Hannes
On 24.05.19 23:10, Ardavan Oskooi wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 16:49, Hannes Kohlmann wrote:
>
>> Does the D_conductivity get ignored when it appears in the
>> Medium(...) in a material_fct?
>
>
> If you have a D conductivity in your material function, you will also
> need to specify this in the extra_materials
> <https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Python_User_Interface/#the-simulation-class>
> parameter otherwise it will be ignored (which is what you are observing).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> meep-discuss mailing list
> meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Attachment: pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to