Hey Ardavan, thanks for your reply! I reported an issue (#892 <https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/issues/892>), because I think I found a bug still related to #687 <https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/issues/687>. Seems as if under certain circumstances the D_conductivity still gets ignored. I was able to reproduce my observation by means of the example code from this previous bug. I didn't look at the epsilon itself, but how the actual fields behaved - that's what I meant by "it seems as my material was transparent".
Best regards Hannes On 24.05.19 23:10, Ardavan Oskooi wrote: > > On 5/23/19 16:49, Hannes Kohlmann wrote: > >> Does the D_conductivity get ignored when it appears in the >> Medium(...) in a material_fct? > > > If you have a D conductivity in your material function, you will also > need to specify this in the extra_materials > <https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Python_User_Interface/#the-simulation-class> > parameter otherwise it will be ignored (which is what you are observing). > > > _______________________________________________ > meep-discuss mailing list > meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu > http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss