Thank you very much!
Great!

Em seg, 19 de out de 2020 12:28, Alexander Cerjan <alexcer...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> If you are interested in studying the types of PT structures which possess
> patterned no-loss --- loss regions, which are typically what is studied
> experimentally, using a conductivity to introduce your (spatially
> inhomogeneous) loss is a good way to go. However, if you really do want to
> use gain in your system, the only way to do this is using saturable gain,
> https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Materials/#saturable-gain-and-absorption,
> which corresponds to a slightly more complicated model for the gain than
> what is typically considered in the PT literature, as it includes
> non-linear saturation of the gain medium. You might be wondering why you
> can't just add "eps - 1i*gain" type of linear dielectric to your system in
> Meep, but the reason is that such a term will always lead to diverging
> fields in a time-domain simulation, the non-linear saturation present in
> the saturable gain model prohibits this, and also corresponds to what
> happens in physical systems. If you use saturable gain, you can alternate
> with regions of saturable loss to maintain PT of your passive structure.
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:48 AM Cícero Julião <juliaojun...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for your reply. However, perhaps I should explain my
>> question better.
>>
>> I was working on using a Gaussian pulse as a source.
>> I used a Gaussian font with a very short df, but there were still a lot
>> of resonances.
>> Then I thought of a continuous wave, so there would be only one frequency
>> for analysis.
>> But then the unwanted frequencies produced by the nature of the
>> continuous wave appear.
>> I didn't know what to do.
>>
>> If someone has already simulated material with PT symmetry and can
>> provide some help, it would be wonderful.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De: Patrick Flanigan <flani...@etaphase.com>
>> Date: seg., 19 de out. de 2020 às 01:54
>> Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] pt symmetry
>> To: Cícero Julião <juliaojun...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: <meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu>
>>
>>
>> This might help:
>> https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Materials/#conductivity-and-complex
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:23 PM Cícero Julião <juliaojun...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear friends,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to write a code to simulate material with PT symmetry. But
>>> I'm not sure how to include gain and loss in the dielectric constant.
>>>
>>> For example, can we use the material library to modulate material gain
>>> and loss? Or is it necessary to write the epsilon function by hand?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much to all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Cícero Julião da Silva Junior
>>> ____________________________________
>>> Instituto Federal de Alagoas - IFAL
>>> Campus Murici
>>> http://www.ifal.edu.br/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> meep-discuss mailing list
>>> meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
>>> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Flanigan
>> Etaphase, Inc.
>> 8201 NE 164th Avenue, Suite 200
>> Redmond, WA 98052
>> http://etaphase.com/
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Cícero Julião da Silva Junior
>> ____________________________________
>> Instituto Federal de Alagoas - IFAL
>> Campus Murici
>> http://www.ifal.edu.br/
>> _______________________________________________
>> meep-discuss mailing list
>> meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
>> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss

Reply via email to