I use NewRelic's free tier for an application of mine. It's an incredibly comprehensive solution. It also does a fair bit of log aggregating. Setup was extremely easy - in my case I have a Flask application on uWSGI, so getting it to work was as simple as throwing two lines into the app's __init__.py after the imports.
I was really surprised - and impressed - when one of their reps called me from the US on my mobile after I signed up, to discuss some oddities they were seeing (basically, logged high latency from an external service I was using and they were calling to make sure the issue wasn't their agent!). I've been able to use some of the introspection features to improve response times (you can define key transactions and collect detailed info on database latency, slow points, etc). I spent a month in a free trial of the paid tier, of course. It's a bit pricey, so I couldn't get budget for it - but what you get for what you pay is really quite decent. Can't say enough nice things. Also, free T-shirt! For issues and feedback - several people have suggested Trac to me in the past. It of course has the benefit of integrating with Mercurial and Git really nicely. I've been told it can be customised extensively to turn it into a full product helpdesk system, but I've always ended up concluding that it doesn't meet my requirements (I need some features like detailed SLA tracking that it just doesn't have). Cheers, Chris On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Javier Candeira <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm about to start evaluating external scm, logging, monitoring, > analytics, issues, etc. services for an in-the-cloud application, and > I'd like your advice/opinion on the ones you already use. > > Monitoring: I'm currently using Server Density for monitoring with > another client, and dislike it (it initialises your / as a git > repository, if you can believe it). It's not cheap either. Any of you > uses New Relic? > > Logging: In the past I used the Splunk free tier for logging and > analytics, and it was fine. but I also think we never used it to its > full potential. I also wonder if we could have monitoring and logging > rolled into one, thus saving cost and complexity. > > Scm: for private repos, I'm happier with bitbucket than I am with > github. Also, I've not been bit by outages once, which is nice. > > Issue management/Customer feedback: I only know it as a regular > punter, but I like UserVoice. > > Firsthand experience much appreciated! > > Javier > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug >
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
