It'd be pretty fun to have a mode for the interpreter such that, if, when a particular property was 'undefined', the implementation did it's best to make sure it was a undefined as possible.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:27 AM, David Crisp <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks everyone, > > I have examined the way I was writing my code and .. Bulk deleted the > entire block that was causing the problem with the intention of re-writing > it! :) > > Okay: SO i had a look at what I was doing and realsied it was slightly > regressive so I am having another look at my structure! > > Regards, > David Crisp > > > > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Javier Candeira wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jason King <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> yup, associative arrays , (in awk), dicts in python , and the perl >>> version >>> of them are all like this, you can't specify the order in which the >>> contents are output. >>> >>> There is an OrderedDict (http://docs.python.org/2/ >>> library/collections.html#collections.OrderedDict) >>> if insertion order is important to you. >>> >> >> >> And, to add to Jason's Rosetta Stone of mappings, I believe Ruby hashes >> (which is the name dicts have in that faraway land) are always ordered, at >> least from 1.9 onwards. >> >> J >> >> _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > -- Noon Silk Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy -- the joy of being this signature."
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
