It would be the opposite of the Maybe monad. We could call it the "no effing way, absolutely not" monad.
J On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:23 PM, William ML Leslie < [email protected]> wrote: > On 14 March 2014 11:30, Noon Silk <[email protected]> wrote: > > It'd be pretty fun to have a mode for the interpreter such that, if, > when a > > particular property was 'undefined', the implementation did it's best to > > make sure it was a undefined as possible. > > That's a superb idea! > > -- > William Leslie > > Notice: > Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered > under copyright law. You absolutely may reproduce any part of it in > accordance with the copyright law of the nation you are reading this > in. Any attempt to deny you those rights would be illegal without > prior contractual agreement. > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug >
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
