I've been watching this thread with interest and even joined it briefly a little while ago. And I am now noticing something.

We are all software people and therefore we all recognise disaster when we see it. In hindsight most disasters come from inadequate specifications or misunderstanding user requirements.

Javier sees a way to achieve something with simplicity - pragmatic?

Brianna sees an opportunity to improve our scenario for women - ideal?

There are obviously other motivations outlined by others over the few weeks this has been running.

We should start a new thread to review and enumerate the requirements before looking at the proposed CoC again.

That will be 2.2 cents thanks

Mike

On 18/03/2015 9:16 AM, Javier Candeira wrote:
Thanks, Brianna, and sorry for not having been able to answer earlier.

    I think two things would be useful: being specific about who are the
    points of contact. Perhaps this could be part of the intro spiel.
    Ideally they would be mentioned by name and be standing at the front
    of the room to be visible.


Yes, I think it's a matter of having a good script. Also of having
organisers coming forward. I know I sound like a broken record, but
nothing of this works without people saying, in this case "I'm happy to
be a point of contact for the Code of Conduct" (or to find talks, to
help with the room, etc.)


    Second is having a clear idea about what action those people might
    take, when a report is made. The Geek Feminism wiki has a ton of
    information on Code of Conducts and a page all about responding to
    reports:
    
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Responding_to_reports

    I suggest this as a starting point, not that everything here should
    be adopted wholesale for MPUG. I think it is important that the
    organisers "own" the policy in that they have been deliberate in
    their thinking and this is actively how they want to approach it.


Yeah. Something I don't want, however, is to make the process too heavy
either. This is two hours a month on a purely volunteer basis. So a
compromise between effectiveness and expediency must be found.


    Another thing that is cool is encouraging bystanders to speak up if
    they hear/see something inappropriate. I went to a talk by Karen
    Sandler earlier this year and she had the whole audience practice
    saying "Dude, that's not cool". It is pretty cheesy but it's not a
    bad ice-breaker, and I actually heard someone at a later talk say it
    - so it works! I think this is really great because a lot of small
    things may not constitute harassment but nonetheless can make you
    feel unwelcome. Having someone else speak up like that feels
    amazing. And also, it shows that you don't have to perfectly
    articulate exactly why something was inappropriate, or berate
    someone for what may be an innocent or just thoughtless mistake.


Sure, and that's an exercise I'd enjoy at Pycon. Which is once a year,
and where I'd do it once, surrounded by many ( > Dunbar number)
strangers. At MPUG, monthly, surrounded by < 30 mostly the same people,
I would feel patronised if I were asked to do it a second time.

Having said that, "that's not cool" is a good callout.

I'll try to edit a mention to the CoC in the mailing list interface
today, and I'll keep in mind to ask Pycon people whether they can have
an org-agnostic CoC that can just be referenced by anyone.

b


    cheers,
    Brianna
    Â


    On 10 March 2015 at 14:34, Huw Davies
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


        On 10 Mar 2015, at 1:56 am, Tim Krins <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Huw,

        It is probably because the link you clicked on in this email
        is part of the Wiki wording, and the sending email client has
        include the pipe character in the URL it detected.

        If you strip out the wiki markdown formatting, you will get
        http://2013.pycon-au.org/register/code_of_conduct , which
        should link you to the article.

        Thanks to all who pointed this out. Now that I can see it, I
        very much agree with it.

        Huw Davies          | e-mail:
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        Melbourne           | "If soccer was meant to be played in the

        Australia           | air, the sky would be painted green"Â



        _______________________________________________
        melbourne-pug mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug




    --
    They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
    http://modernthings.org/

    _______________________________________________
    melbourne-pug mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug




_______________________________________________
melbourne-pug mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug


_______________________________________________
melbourne-pug mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug

Reply via email to