Yes, because its a mailing list. On 3 Jun 2015 1:06 pm, "Brian May" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 at 12:39 Tennessee Leeuwenburg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I personally don't believe that list settings really fulfil the goal of >> providing information security to emails. I think people are responsible >> for checking their own correspondence. This is a public forum, and its main >> purpose to provide a social forum for people to interact in. I agree that >> hitting 'reply all' is a common failure mode, but I would rather optimise >> for the common usage case. >> > > It isn't "Reply All" that has this problem - that is suppose to go to > everyone. It is "Reply" that has this problem. > > With reply-to set, the only way to get a private reply with many clients > is to manually copy and paste the senders address. > > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > >
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
