Tennessee Leeuwenburg <tleeuwenb...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks for the responses. I appreciate the argument about harm > minimisation, and the position that 'best interests' rather than > majority rule is appropriate in some circumstances. Those are both > valid points.
What of the point that this is a decision to be made by an administrator informed about the issues, and not by popular appeal? > Regardless of that, there is not a clear majority supporting changing > the current settings. It seems you dismiss the idea that the administrator should do what is best based on the facts and trade-offs, whether or not it is most popular. You defer that responsibility instead to whichever group marshals the most voices. That's a disappointment. -- \ “People always ask me, ‘Where were you when Kennedy was shot?’ | `\ Well, I don't have an alibi.” —Emo Philips | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list melbourne-pug@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
