Le 2025-02-04T12:26:18.000+01:00, Ralph Meijer <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi, > > Comments inline below. It might be lengthy, bear with me. > > On 04/02/2025 08.22, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > >> Hi Guus, >> >> thank you for bringing this up. >> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 3:32 PM Guus der Kinderen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If the term "XMPP" attracts such attention from the FOSDEM crowd, we >>>should consider using it more explicitly during FOSDEM. Specifically, I'd >>>like us to consider renaming the name of our stand "the Realtime Lounge" >>>into something that contains the letters "XMPP". I believe that this would >>>help a lot for recognition with the public. >>> >>> People that now look through the list of stands on FOSDEM's website, or >>>on the printed maps at the venue itself, do not see "XMPP" anywhere. I >>>believe it would be helpful if they would. For the years that I've visited, >>>I cannot recall having a non-XMPP presence in our stand, so I don't think >>>that we would be excluding projects or people by implementing a rename (but >>>please do correct me if I'm wrong). >> >> I agree. The booth should be called: (Jabber) XMPP Standards Foundation >> or something close that ideally contains both the words Jabber as well as >>XMPP. >> >> This is both for discoverability for people that want to find us as >> well as for just raising awareness that XMPP is still a thing. I >> believe that even if people don’t decide to come by our stand just >> reading the name in the booklet or the listing on the website can have >> positive effects. > > A bit of history. After Edwin and I had organized the Jabber / XMPP > booth for many years, in 2011 the community discussed the concept of > a sort of Lounge for realtime technologies, at and around the &yet > confererence titled the "The Keeping it Realtime Conference". This > resulted in a conversation with the FOSDEM organizing team to find a > location with more room than a regular stand (we used to be able to > get two tables back then), where we could have a relaxed atmosphere > and show off realtime projects. The intent was having proper demos > alongside the cushions and tables, etc. > > As FOSDEM would be using the new K building for the first time in > 2012, we had the opportunity to work with them to pick a location, > which ended up being the place have been ever since. But initially > it was just us, then a few years together with Jitsi, and then > various setups after that. For a long time we also brought our own > lighting and the printed bean bags came in 2014. > > I see the point of the branding. One of the reasons why we've used > Realtime Lounge, rather than XMPP Standards Foundation or XMPP / > Jabber, is that with the enormous increase in popularity and size of > the event, and the decline of XMPP in the public eye, we weren't > sure that we'd get accepted that way. And while I am not convinced > that it has really hurt our cause, I agree that we could totally > name it something like "REALTIME LOUNGE BY XMPP STANDARDS > FOUNDATION" or something, just like NLNet did. I am not sure if the > name Jabber brings us anything significantly, until (if ever), we > will actively start using that name in our community again. I say > the latter with sadness. > >>> A secondary, but to me separate, change that we might consider is moving >>>away from the "lounge" concept. Although it's nice to have a place to chill >>>out, those bean bags also take up a lot of space. From what I've seen in the >>>past few years, the lounge is almost exclusively used by people manning the >>>stands (myself included), and not so much by visitors. I don't believe it's >>>doing much these days to help us engage in conversations with FOSDEM >>>visitors. Maybe we can find a better use for that space in future editions >>>of FOSDEM. >>> >>> Please share your thoughts on this. I'm conscious that much of what we do >>>is rooted in tradition and history, and I certainly don't want to trample on >>>that - but if there is generic consensus that some changes may be desirable, >>>it's something that we can consider for 2026. >> >> I haven’t been at our FOSDEM stand in a while but last time I have I >> made similar observations as Guus. No guest ever comes into the >> "lounge" part. > > Unfortunately, the concept of doing various demos > [https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Conferences/FOSDEM_2012#Demos] was mostly > lost, because we have not been great at planning ahead. I think the > concept would still work if we would put some time into it. And yes, > they would probably still all be XMPP-based anyway, but I'd very > much love to see collaborations with other projects, too. > > In some years the area was planned with too many other projects for > the lounge to work as intended. However, we've always had common > visitors in the lounge area, including this year, and I have > personally discussed realtime technologies with them, as did others. > 2024 was particularly great because for the first time in a long > time, we had the whole area to ourselves and many more visitors hung > out there. Also, discussions between us are of value. > > I am not happy about how we had 4 projects in this year's event, and > I tried fixing that with the organizers beforehand. The broken > lighting didn't help either, although that affected the other > projects much more than us. When we still brought our own lights, we > actually disconnected the fluorescent tubes to make it more loungy. > > But the thing I want to point out is this: having the Lounge is a > PRIVILEGE born out of our long-term presence at the event, as well > as good standing with the FOSDEM organizers. No other project has > something like it, or is likely to gain that opportunity. Even if we > don't do much with the seating area right now, it provides us with > way more room for our booth (even with 3 other projects) than any > other project. Imagine the XMPP booth being a single table between > FOSSAsia and VideoLan. Also consider that we MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED > that way, given that demand for a booth is much higher than supply. > > I don't particularly care if it is tradition that we do it like this > every year. The concept probably can use some fresh ideas and > effort. I am looking forward to suggestions _and actual help_ for > making them work out. I'd love to make us talk of the town (again). > > Also note that I have talked to the person currently responsible for > all the stands. They are “scouting an interesting option for > FOSDEM 2026”, so I hope to follow-up with them on that. Whether > that would be better is to be seen, but let's not throw away the > opportunity to do something more than just a one-table stand. > > Let's consider what we want to get out of (being at) FOSDEM. For me, > it is not just telling people about XMPP or accepting donations to > give out swag. It is also to spend more time with people in our > community. > > In the early days, we've also "bracketed" FOSDEM, by doing a > hackathon on Friday and the Summit on Monday, to make it a true > 4-day event. If I remember correctly, we've moved away from that > because not everybody wanted to be at FOSDEM. We used to have a full > day of XMPP presentations in the devroom, but here too there is a > lot of competition. So this year we only had half a day, with just > one presentation on XMPP. I think we can do better there, too. > > In any case, I'm happy to continue hauling our gear and do many > things, but if we want change, I need somebody to step up and > organize that. > > -- > > Cheers, > > ralphm Hi, First and foremost, thanks everyone for being there and thanks particularly to the people who worked on organizing both Summit and FOSDEM presence, it has been a pleasure, as always. I also believe we might at least need to rename our Realtime lounge to something containing XMPP ("XMPP Realtime Lounge"?) in the name, so that people know where to find us, as I have indeed received quite a few remarks boiling down to "I searched XMPP in the list of stands and could not find you". I believe we should keep the lounge concept, but as you say we might need to work harder at having demos or other enticing and shiny conversations starters, and as you underlined that requires planning and work, something I am quite bad at (I did not even prepare for summit properly, let alone FOSDEM). The cushions are great and I think having the option to continue a discussion on the side in one of the most comfy area of FOSDEM is worthwhile, even if that is not happening very often. I understand that not everyone wants to be at FOSDEM (even I myself am considering not going from time to time, due to how crowded it is), but maybe if we want to get more out of FOSDEM we as a community might need to submit more XMPP talks (or even request a devroom again!), so that it gives more substance to our presence at the event, and more conversational topics for visitors to the lounge. I have subtly nudged nicoco in that direction, and I am trying to think of interesting topics for myself. The success of Goffi's talk at least proves that there is demand for quality presentations about XMPP, and I think we should strive to meet that demand. cheers, mathieui
