Derek, they had the shorter struts, but they also had the higher control arm
mounting point so that effectively negates that difference. Not sure about the
ride height though, perhaps it was lower and that wasn't good for Aussie bush
bashing!
Then they started making them in Aus in '69 (I *think*) when the suspension
changes started? who knows..
zac
>Yep.
>
>Some will tell you the ealier cars had a better front end setup anyway. AFAIK
>they were an inch lower ( shorter struts ), and had different knuckle arms.
>Maybe someone can explain why this is a benefit, or at least tell me I'm full
>of **it ?
>
>DF
>
>>does this mean that to be of any benefit when lowering, the earlier
>>x member has to be in a "newer 510", or will benefit the earlier car
>>it came from also??
>
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
