i thought the 44mm valves were larger?
if not these what valves would u reccomend and where from?
would valve springs also ve advisable?



>From: andrew smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 1.8 VS 2.0 ltr head
>Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:54:57 +0800
>
>Ryan,
>Not sure how much of a gain you'll get fitting the 44mm valves but if you 
>have to replace the valves you might as well use the larger ones as they 
>cost the same.The last head i did cost $8 each for the valves,$8 each for 
>hardened seats fitted to suit the larger valves and $8 each guide 
>fitted,$30 to face the head,$90 for the crow springs,$90 for the crow lash 
>pads,$70 for the wade cam.They did the hardness test and pressure test for 
>free and i cut and ground all the seats and valves and did all the porting 
>and combustion chambers.Its also worthwhile blending the bores to the 
>combustion chambers
>Andrew Smith
>
>Ryan Ottens wrote:
>
> > hey andrew,
> > im thinking cam and lash pads are prolly gonna cost me arouond $300
> > get the head matych ported say $100 and maybe 280zx valves.
> > im not looking at spending too much money but enough to get some decent
> > power.
> > will the 280z walves be worth it?
> > thanks again
> > ryan
> >
> > >From: andrew smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: 1.8 VS 2.0 ltr head
> > >Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:13:07 +0800
> > >
> > >Ryan,
> > >Sometimes it works out a lot cheaper to find a head thats already been
> > >done.
> > >If you want to get your head done you'll need to find someone 
>experienced
> > >with
> > >the L series in your state.You could be looking at over a $1000 to get 
>what
> > >you
> > >need.It adds up pretty quick with the cam,valve springs,valves,valve
> > >seats,valve
> > >guides and seals,lash pads,head porting and match porting the
> > >manifold,deshrouding and cc'ing the chambers,facing etc.
> > >A cheaper alternative might be to use the larger port L20 type head and
> > >face it
> > >to get some more comp and fit heavier springs,lash pads and your cam.A 
>lot
> > >depends on your budget and how much power you want.
> > >Andrew Smith
> > >
> > >Ryan 510 Ottens wrote:
> > >
> > > > andrew,
> > > > i dont really plan on doing much of the work myself, as i dont 
>really
> > >have
> > > > the time, equipment or knowledge.
> > > > im willing to pay someone to do it for me, but b4 i start getting
> > >anything
> > > > done i want to know exactly what should get done.
> > > >
> > > > so it seems to port out the 1.8 is the way to go then?
> > > > is polishing worth it?
> > > > anything else i can do?
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > ryan
> > > >
> > > > >From: andrew smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >Subject: Re: 1.8 VS 2.0 ltr head
> > > > >Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:11:51 +0800
> > > > >
> > > > >Ryan,
> > > > >I assume you mean a closed chamber L18 head compared to the open
> > >chamber
> > > > >L20
> > > > >head.Both heads can be modified to suit and probably depends on 
>what
> > >you
> > > > >can
> > > > >do yourself and/or how much your willing to pay someone.Using a 
>closed
> > > > >combustion chamber is the way to go which means the L20 head would 
>need
> > >to
> > > > >be
> > > > >welded up and machined which can be costly.The L18 head would only 
>need
> > >to
> > > > >have a bit of deshrouding in the chambers.The L20 head generally 
>has
> > >larger
> > > > >ports than the L18 head to start with but both would require 
>porting.If
> > > > >your
> > > > >attempting to do the porting yourself i would suggest trying to 
>find
> > > > >something to copy.The last head i did i borrowed a corroded out 
>head of
> > > > >someone that had come off a 200hp L20 and copied that.If you havent
> > >done
> > > > >any
> > > > >porting before, do some homework first.Ive seen plenty of people 
>stuff
> > >up
> > > > >good heads.I would also get a hardness test done on the head before 
>i
> > > > >started
> > > > >anything.
> > > > >Andrew Smith
> > > > >
> > > > >1600 BoY wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hey list,
> > > > > > im stumped at which to choose between the 1.8 or the 2.0 ltr.
> > > > > > currently i got a L20, with twin 45s on the way. plans include 
>big
> > >cam,
> > > > > > clutch, and match ported head.
> > > > > > now i have both a 1.8 and a 2.0 head spare. ive been told some
> > >different
> > > > > > stories but dont know which head will best suit the application. 
>im
> > > > >under
> > > > > > the impression the 1.8 raises compression, but if u shave the 
>2.0
> > >will
> > > > >it
> > > > > > also raise the c/r?
> > > > > > i also plan to get 280zx valves(44mm) but i dont know which 
>head.
> > > > > > IE if i do the same mods to the 1.8 and 2.0 which will benefit
> > >better?
> > > > > > if the 2.0 is ported could u get it ported more than the 1.8, ie 
>is
> > > > >there
> > > > > > restrictions on the 1.8?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > any other mods i should to to the head at all?
> > > > > > thanks list,
> > > > > > Ryan Ottens
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
>_________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
> > >http://messenger.msn.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: 
>http://mobile.msn.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
> >
>




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to