My mates RX7 when it was parked longer than 10 minutes always had the max, RPM set to 900.with his microtech. You could start it just, idle it when it felt like it. Try to drive it any where, and you have no chance. We actually gave the keys to this young supposably good car thief, and said take it if you can. Poor bloke couldn't work out what was happening, or what wasn't happening. LOL. He now doesn't steal anything that looks like it has had improvements done to it, seems to like gemini's now. Later. Rick White. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Kroehn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: RE: removing door locks
> Didn't even thick of that one > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Charles > Scealy > Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2003 3:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: removing door locks > > > If any of you have a computer where you run a vacuum line from the motor > to the computer, I used to just unplug the vacuum line from the back of > my computer. The engine started (just), but ran like a hairy goat - > nobody would bother taking a car that ran like that. > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Daniel Kroehn wrote: > > > I've noticed that my computer manufacturer have added a security function > > back on their computers which makes starting the engine a whole lot harder > > without the code! > > > > Cheers > > > > Daniel Kroehn > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Rudd > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2003 7:07 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: removing door locks > > > > > > Tony, > > > > The thief's in your area are a cut above the ones around here - our > > delightful thief's just smash the quarter window with the first rock that > > they can find and there's not a lot anyone does about it these days. A > good > > 3 way immobiliser means that usually you get to keep what's left of the > car > > though, hopefully enough of it to start again. > > > > regards > > Terry > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Bryant > > Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 2:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: removing door locks > > > > > > > > None of this is a good theft deterent, round here, a hammer through the > side > > window is the usual technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
