Yeah i guess there are heaps of variables to make it a difficult comparison.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brad Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NA kw compared to forced induction Gee that's a hard one to answer... but I like the torque curve of a turbo :) More importantly than outright power I'd consider that in general its cheaper initially to get more power by forced induction rather than working an NA motor. > Hey - does anyone know if there have been any comparisons between naturally > aspirated engines & smaller capacity forced induction engines? eg cams says > you times the capacity by 1.7 wich means a forced inducted 1.2 ltr engine is > equilavent to a 2.0 ltr naturally aspirated engine. I had a quick google > search but couldnt find anything. Is a 1.2 ltr turbo actually equal to a > 2.0 ltr ? or would the turbo engine actually perform better ? > > ta jeff > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
