early 240K (C110) have 271mm (274mm?) thery arnt twin but the same as stock
510 just a lot bigger.
Later 240K I think about 1975ish went 254mm being the same as 240,260z,etc
These are the ones that are a comen cailper for many cars being single
oppisoed ,being one piston each side.
When someone talks twin pistion ussally mean twin being two per side..
I think it was Austin of England who had a early 70's car with twin pistion
brake cailpars,,I asked a couple of brake people and they both said std 1600
brakes are better than those
Malcolm
----- Original Message -----
From: "rclough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: front brake setup in 1600
Its been a long time, you have stretched my memory and think your right.
Coupes had the twin pistons for sure.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: front brake setup in 1600
My 240K sedan had 270mm discs with single piston calipers. It was an auto
and about a 1976? from memory. I think you have it the wrong way around.
Coupes had smaller discs with twin spots
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "rclough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: front brake setup in 1600
>
> The centres for the bolts that hold the struts onto the radius
arms/steering
> arms are further apart on C210's and later models.
>
> You ideally need to get 240K Coupe struts. These have the bigger dia
(270mm)
> discs, twin piston calipers and fit the 1600 bolt pattern. 240K sedan
struts
> also fit, but you loose the extra 16mm disc dia and you only get single
> piston calipers. However the twin piston sumitomo calipers (240K
> Coupe/240Z/ plus some other jap models of that era and later) are
> interchangable on these struts.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuey Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:54 PM
> Subject: RE: front brake setup in 1600
>
>
> > um, i dont know, i thought they were all the same....... i will have
to
> have
> > a look, i havent got the c210 struts yet.... i thought they were the
same
> as
> > the 240k struts, only difference being it has the 270mm disks... is
this
> not
> > the case, are these struts different???
> >
> > >From: "Mohit K. Autar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [email protected]
> > >To: <[email protected]>
> > >Subject: RE: front brake setup in 1600
> > >Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:53:38 +1200
> > >
> > >Hi there,
> > >
> > >if you are going to use the struts from the skyline which radius arm
will
> > >you use with the strut.
> > >the STD 1600 ones are closer compared too the skyline one.
> > >
> > >mohit.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stuey
Roberts
> > >Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:53 PM
> > >To: [email protected]
> > >Subject: front brake setup in 1600
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Hey there listers, i have a few questions as i need to redo my front
> brake
> > >setup.
> > >I need to buy a new 180B booster, my reco just blew. Im looking at
> getting
> > >a
> > >pair of struts from a KMGC210 skyline (2door) and they have the
270mm
> > >disks
> > >with single spot calipers i think. Should i use the twim master
> > >from
> that
> > >c210, i assume they are the smae as the 240k master\?? which is
> > >what
i
> > >have. And do i need to use a proportioning valve from a 180B???
> > >or
is
> it
> > >fine without?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > >Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date:
6/07/2005
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > >Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date:
6/07/2005
> > >
> > >
> > ><< InterScan_Disclaimer.txt >>
> > >No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > >Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date:
6/07/2005
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date:
6/07/2005
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date:
6/07/2005
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date:
> 8/07/2005
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date:
> 8/07/2005
>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 8/07/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 8/07/2005
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: 9/07/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: 9/07/2005
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: 9/07/2005
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: 9/07/2005
