On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:46 PM, PlumbersStock.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right now the data set is about 2GB but it's been growing fast so I'm > looking at the most effective way to use the hardware we already have > sitting mostly idle to handle the growth. We have pretty pimp Windows > machines but most of them are idle most of the time so it seems like a > way better use than sitting idle or running a SETI client. It's > largely a theoretical question though. It's interesting to try to put > all those spare machines to use.
The problem is that without consistent hashing, all your keys are a miss when someone reboots their machine. Some clients support consistent hashing, though... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memcached?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
