I haven't used windows for a long time, so I might be wrong, but doesn't windowsxp limit the number of incoming network connections to something low like 10?
You might find that using your non-server pc's for memcache might not work out so good. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:23 AM, PlumbersStock.com < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like to play with experimental features that might be more intense. > Been doing a lot of work on predicting customer behavior and product > recommendations and stuff. Mostly trying to get ideas that could turn > into something useful at some point. > > memcached may be low for CPU usage but I did see a marked boost when I > moved it from a virtual machine (most of our servers live in > virtualzation) to a physical machine. > > > With only 2GB of data, you can handle that with 1 or 2 machines ... > > unless you had a massive amount of traffic with a large number of > > webservers then I could see adding a few more. > > > > Keep in mind also, memcached is very low for CPU use so those machines > > would still be at "idle" :D > > > > -- "Be excellent to each other" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memcached?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
