Hi!
Just something else to throw into the equation:
http://gearmanproject.org/doku.php?id=protocol
This is the protocol as outlined by Gearman. A few of us are reworking
it at the moment, but keeping backwards compatibility with the current
version.
Cheers,
-Brian
On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Aaron Stone wrote:
Heh, nice blog post :-)
I agree that the queues that are out there and using hacked up
memcache protocols are doing us a great disservice -- I think if we
build a smart way to do a message queue into a binary protocol
extension, we can drive minds in the right direction, and provide
ourselves with something useful in the process.
Also, it would help us to slow down the rate of splinter projects.
Pluggable storage engines and message queues are I think the only
areas where the memcached-alikes play.
Aaron
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 6, 12:48 pm, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a mailing list link? It'd be good to continue with where you
left
off / review what you were thinking at the time.
I wrote about it on my embarrassingly tongue-in-cheek titled blog:
http://www.rockstarprogrammer.org/post/2008/oct/04/what-matters-asynchronous-job-queue/
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
