I didn't realize that gearman is a binary protocol -- are you just now defining one?
Aaron On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brian Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > Just something else to throw into the equation: > http://gearmanproject.org/doku.php?id=protocol > > This is the protocol as outlined by Gearman. A few of us are reworking it at > the moment, but keeping backwards compatibility with the current version. > > Cheers, > -Brian > > On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Aaron Stone wrote: > >> >> Heh, nice blog post :-) >> >> I agree that the queues that are out there and using hacked up >> memcache protocols are doing us a great disservice -- I think if we >> build a smart way to do a message queue into a binary protocol >> extension, we can drive minds in the right direction, and provide >> ourselves with something useful in the process. >> >> Also, it would help us to slow down the rate of splinter projects. >> Pluggable storage engines and message queues are I think the only >> areas where the memcached-alikes play. >> >> Aaron >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Nov 6, 12:48 pm, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Have a mailing list link? It'd be good to continue with where you left >>>> off / review what you were thinking at the time. >>> >>> I wrote about it on my embarrassingly tongue-in-cheek titled blog: >>> >>> >>> http://www.rockstarprogrammer.org/post/2008/oct/04/what-matters-asynchronous-job-queue/ > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org > Seattle, Washington > http://krow.net/ <-- Me > http://tangent.org/ <-- Software > _______________________________________________________ > You can't grep a dead tree. > > > >
