I have been using it for development use for over a month now and I have
not experienced any problems whatsoever.  We don't use it in our production
environment, however, so I can't say how stable it is for production use.

I hope that helps.


Brandon Ramirez | Office: 585.214.5013 | Fax: 585.295.4848
Software Engineer II | Element K | www.elementk.com





                                                                                
                                   
  From:       Matt Ingenthron <[email protected]>                                
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
  To:         [email protected]                                        
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
  Date:       02/09/2010 04:11 AM                                               
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
  Subject:    Re: Assertion Failed for Items > 1MB                              
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
  Sent by:    [email protected]                                        
                                   
                                                                                
                                   





Hi Marc,

Marc Bollinger wrote:
> Just curious, Northscale guys: how stable would you consider the build
> on your website currently (e.g. are you using it in production, or
> would you recommend using it in production)?
>

There will be a release which we consider thoroughly tested and ready
for any production environment.  As far as whether the build which is
there is ready for your production environment, that varies.

Except for an issue that appears to be related to dynamic linking
restrictions on Microsoft's Azure, we aren't aware of any outstanding
issues.  We haven't encountered any stability or functional issues, and
haven't had any reports of any yet.

There are a number of people with it deployed in developer environments,
more on desktops, and we've not heard of any issues there.  I'm pretty
sure there's at least one deployment someone considers "production",
though that designation may be applied to very different deployments.

In the mean time, if you have any feedback, we'd love to hear about it.

Thanks!

- Matt

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi there again!
>>
>> The updated, tested binary is
>> http://downloads.northscale.com/memcached-win32-1.4.4-54-g136cb6e.zip
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> nkranes wrote:
>>
>>> I'm getting an Access Denied error.
>>>
>>> On Jan 12, 2:48 pm, Patrick Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi there!
>>>>
>>>> I built a new binary that you can try out if you like at :
>>>>
>>>> http://downloads.northscale.com/memcached-win32-1.4.4-53-g0b7694c.zip
>>>>
>>>> We're in the process of testing this right now, but if you want to
give
>>>> it a shot, please feel free!
>>>>
>>>> --Patrick
>>>>
>>>> nkranes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I am using the Windows version of memcached 1.2.5 in production
>>>>> without issue.  I am attempting to upgrade to 1.4.4 (from
>>>>> http://labs.northscale.com/memcached-packages/) to take advantage of
>>>>> the configurable item size limitation.  Whenever I try to store an
>>>>> item > 1MB I get the following error:
>>>>>      Assertion failed: it->nbytes < (1024 * 1024), file items.c, line
>>>>> 284
>>>>>      The line of code in items.c is:
>>>>> assert(it->nbytes < (1024 * 1024));  /* 1MB max size */
>>>>>      So how could this possibly work?  I can remove that assertion,
but
>>>>> was
>>>>> curious to see if anyone knew why it was there considering the item
>>>>> limit *should* now be configurable.
>>>>>      Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>




Reply via email to