Awesome, thanks for the usage info! We're going to do some testing then, and start integrating it into some not-as-essential clusters. Matt, we'll let you know if we run into any stability or such issues, and thanks to your team for putting together the release!
- Marc On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been using it for development use for over a month now and I have > not experienced any problems whatsoever. We don't use it in our production > environment, however, so I can't say how stable it is for production use. > > I hope that helps. > > > Brandon Ramirez | Office: 585.214.5013 | Fax: 585.295.4848 > Software Engineer II | Element K | www.elementk.com > > > > > > > From: Matt Ingenthron <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Date: 02/09/2010 04:11 AM > > Subject: Re: Assertion Failed for Items > 1MB > > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > > > > Hi Marc, > > Marc Bollinger wrote: >> Just curious, Northscale guys: how stable would you consider the build >> on your website currently (e.g. are you using it in production, or >> would you recommend using it in production)? >> > > There will be a release which we consider thoroughly tested and ready > for any production environment. As far as whether the build which is > there is ready for your production environment, that varies. > > Except for an issue that appears to be related to dynamic linking > restrictions on Microsoft's Azure, we aren't aware of any outstanding > issues. We haven't encountered any stability or functional issues, and > haven't had any reports of any yet. > > There are a number of people with it deployed in developer environments, > more on desktops, and we've not heard of any issues there. I'm pretty > sure there's at least one deployment someone considers "production", > though that designation may be applied to very different deployments. > > In the mean time, if you have any feedback, we'd love to hear about it. > > Thanks! > > - Matt > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi there again! >>> >>> The updated, tested binary is >>> http://downloads.northscale.com/memcached-win32-1.4.4-54-g136cb6e.zip >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> nkranes wrote: >>> >>>> I'm getting an Access Denied error. >>>> >>>> On Jan 12, 2:48 pm, Patrick Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi there! >>>>> >>>>> I built a new binary that you can try out if you like at : >>>>> >>>>> http://downloads.northscale.com/memcached-win32-1.4.4-53-g0b7694c.zip >>>>> >>>>> We're in the process of testing this right now, but if you want to > give >>>>> it a shot, please feel free! >>>>> >>>>> --Patrick >>>>> >>>>> nkranes wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I am using the Windows version of memcached 1.2.5 in production >>>>>> without issue. I am attempting to upgrade to 1.4.4 (from >>>>>> http://labs.northscale.com/memcached-packages/) to take advantage of >>>>>> the configurable item size limitation. Whenever I try to store an >>>>>> item > 1MB I get the following error: >>>>>> Assertion failed: it->nbytes < (1024 * 1024), file items.c, line >>>>>> 284 >>>>>> The line of code in items.c is: >>>>>> assert(it->nbytes < (1024 * 1024)); /* 1MB max size */ >>>>>> So how could this possibly work? I can remove that assertion, > but >>>>>> was >>>>>> curious to see if anyone knew why it was there considering the item >>>>>> limit *should* now be configurable. >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > > > > >
