On Feb 21, 2010, at 12:42 AM, Vijay Raghunathan wrote: > Libev has a compatability mode for libevent. It's not as efficient as using > libev directly, but it should allow you to determine the stability of the > underlying library. >
I got to agree with Dormando that we haven't had any problems with libevent, and from my performance measurement on memcached I haven't seen libevent as a pain point.. Cheers, Trond > Vijay > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 20, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Trond Norbye <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok, I didn't read the license link myself ;-) >> >> Changing something involves a risk of breaking stuff... What can we expect >> to gain if we start using libev ? >> >> Trond >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 20. feb. 2010, at 22.29, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The link is actually to a BSD-ish 'retain the copyright notice' license, >>> with the GPL permitted as an alternative. >>> >>> >>> >>> Trond Norbye wrote: >>>> Then I guess the answer is no, because memcached is BSD... >>>> Trond >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On 20. feb. 2010, at 16.23, Ryan Chan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2月18日, 下午11時27分, Paul Lindner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I didn't see any mention of the license. libevent is bsd, which >>>>>> integrates >>>>>> well with the memcached license. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/LICENSE?view=markup >>>>> >>>>> GPLv2 >>>
