On Mar 18, 4:32 am, Stephen Johnston <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is the Northscale Windows 1.4.x not compatible with the existing clients at > least as far as the feature set the clients do support or am I missing the > intent of these statements? The NorthScale distribution is fully compatible with existing clients. What you do now will work there. In addition, we've added some capabilities that (if and only if you want to take advantage of them) require some client-side support - like multi-tenancy and automatic server list updates. If you're not interested in that stuff, you can ignore it and use your existing client as-is. On Mar 18, 5:04 am, Henrik Schröder <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sure it is working perfectly fine, what I meant with "good" was an > official windows release that can be easily built out of the main memcached > repository, preferably without any external dependencies. The Northscale > version is yet another single version binary build posted on some webpage, > just > likehttp://jehiah.cz/projects/memcached-win32/andhttp://www.splinedancer.com/memcached-win32/andhttp://code.google.com/p/beitmemcached/downloads/list This is a good assessment, but you'll have all the parts you need to build it yourself within about two weeks -- this is our current priority. The bulk of the parts are sitting in the engine branch now, but we did have to do a lot to get it building, running, and tested under Windows. I really don't want to be burdening the list with commercial stuff, but I would think anything that looks like proprietary stuff bubbling up should be called out and I thank you for that. Our policy is to keep our contributions open. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to memcached+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
