=] can you use 1.2.1 without problems? use it ehheeheh i don't know if you will get more speed with newer version if you don't know, please continue trying in this mail list. i can't help with windows :(
2011/2/8 Sean <[email protected]>: > I am using only one telnet to test the memcache. So only one client > and 0 keys. On the same machine, if I run memcached.exe version 1.2.1, > it works fine. > > On Feb 8, 2:02 pm, Roberto Spadim <[email protected]> wrote: >> i don't know, but can memcache use windows pipes? >> shared memory protocol? >> for loop back (127.0.0.1) arp table have always 1 register (internal >> on arp engine, or inside arp table), i think that's not a arp problem >> too... >> maybe windows virtual memory problem? >> what's your today app size? >> how many clients at same time? >> how many keys? >> what's the average key length? >> >> 2011/2/8 <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> > Comment #9 on issue 122 by [email protected]: failed to write, and not >> > due blocking: No error >> >http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=122 >> >> > I don't think it's related to ARP either, since I am using the loopback >> > interface 127.0.0.1. The arp table is not full. I can stably repro this >> > issue on a few machines right after I start the memcache.exe. On some other >> > machines, it works fine though. I can't figure out the differences between >> > these machines. They are of the same Windows version with all last patches. >> >> -- >> Roberto Spadim >> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial -- Roberto Spadim Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
