I am getting it from membase:
http://blog.elijaa.org/index.php?post/2010/08/25/Memcached-1.4.5-for-Windows

I also tried build it myself using mingw. It turns out with the same
error.



On Feb 8, 2:46 pm, dormando <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think anyone knows why that particular port of memcached has
> trouble; I'm assuming it's a buggy libevent, or buggy interaction with
> libevent. Given that it's an unhandled socket error :P
>
> Where did you get the windows binary from?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> > =] can you use 1.2.1 without problems? use it ehheeheh
> > i don't know if you will get more speed with newer version
> > if you don't know, please continue trying in this mail list. i can't
> > help with windows :(
>
> > 2011/2/8 Sean <[email protected]>:
> > > I am using only one telnet to test the memcache. So only one client
> > > and 0 keys. On the same machine, if I run memcached.exe version 1.2.1,
> > > it works fine.
>
> > > On Feb 8, 2:02�pm, Roberto Spadim <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> i don't know, but can memcache use windows pipes?
> > >> shared memory protocol?
> > >> for loop back (127.0.0.1) arp table have always 1 register (internal
> > >> on arp engine, or inside arp table), i think that's not a arp problem
> > >> too...
> > >> maybe windows virtual memory problem?
> > >> what's your today app size?
> > >> how many clients at same time?
> > >> how many keys?
> > >> what's the average key length?
>
> > >> 2011/2/8 �<[email protected]>:
>
> > >> > Comment #9 on issue 122 by [email protected]: failed to write, and 
> > >> > not
> > >> > due blocking: No error
> > >> >http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=122
>
> > >> > I don't think it's related to ARP either, since I am using the loopback
> > >> > interface 127.0.0.1. The arp table is not full. I can stably repro this
> > >> > issue on a few machines right after I start the memcache.exe. On some 
> > >> > other
> > >> > machines, it works fine though. I can't figure out the differences 
> > >> > between
> > >> > these machines. They are of the same Windows version with all last 
> > >> > patches.
>
> > >> --
> > >> Roberto Spadim
> > >> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>
> > --
> > Roberto Spadim
> > Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial

Reply via email to