On 28. feb. 2011, at 15.32, Jaime Medrano Navarro wrote: > Hi. > > At tuenti, we have found a performance degradation on UDP that can be > solved using a range of ports instead of a single one. > > More info on the problem and the solution can be found here: > http://blog.tuenti.com/dev/using-udp-in-memcached/ > > And the patch with the implementation: > > https://github.com/tuenti/memcached-tuenti-multiport/commit/50736adb879b687b59918bac2559e3a99116141b > > We'd like that patch to be included, since it's very little invasive > and the performance gain is huge. >
I don't have any huge objections to this patch, but I'd rather change the logic so instead of specifying the number of ports and have them in a range I'd prefer if we used multiple -h hostname:port and -U hostname:port. That would allow you to bind to multiple specific interfaces and multiple port numbers.. ex: -h *:11211 -h *:11212 -h *:11213 etc what do you think? Trond
