On 1. mars 2011, at 10.42, Jaime Medrano Navarro wrote: > > That syntax is ok for me, but you're missing the most important part > of my patch: change the mapping between udp sockets and threads. >
Sorry, I forgot that part ;) I'll add it. Cheers, Trond > If only one port is provided, we should keep the current behaviour > because of compatibility: map the socket to all the threads. > > However, if more than one is specified, mapping between udp sockets > and threads has to be one to one in order to get the performance gain. > > Regards, > Jaime. > > -- > Jaime Medrano > Senior Backend Engineer @ Tuenti > http://www.tuenti.com
