> I am currently fiddling with the slab allocator and one thing messes
> my understanding of the concept. Think about the following scenario:
>
> 1) start memcached with ./memcached -m 1 (with 1 Mb of memory limit)
> 2) set mykey 0 0 11 --> allocates a 1 Mb slab and a chunk is returned
> for about the smallest possible chunk
> 3) set mykey2 0 0 200 -- ?
>
> Now I cannot understand what happens in the 3rd step? There is no
> memory left for another slab error returned or something else? I have
> tried to test this on my machine but somehow cannot interpret the
> results correctly. 2nd step does allocate 1 MB of slab with 96 bytes
> of chunk size? I am right?

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=95

will be fixed at some point...

Reply via email to