On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:21:11 -0500 Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> wrote:
TZ> Also you may be interested in http://www.couchbase.org/membase which TZ> speaks the memcached protocol but is replicated on the backend. I TZ> haven't used it so I can't say if it will be useful to you, but I'd TZ> like to know who has. There's also, more recently, the Couchbase TZ> 2.0 server http://www.couchbase.org/get/couchbase/2.0.0 which "is a TZ> distributed, document-oriented NoSQL database system that unites the TZ> simplicity and reliability of CouchDB, with the performance of TZ> Memcached and elasticity of Membase technology" according to their TZ> page. As with plain Membase, I don't know much about it but would TZ> love to know if others here have compared it with plain memcached. TZ> It seems like a decent product and has a community edition... No one here has tried Membase or Couchbase? That's surprising. I am interested in them as compared to plain memcached so I hope this is the right place to discuss them. Ted
