There are a bunch of users you can tap in to re: membase/couchbase on the couchbase.org community forum or on the couchbase list on googlegroups. Many there have and do use multiple technologies and can talk about relative experiences.
James On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:21:11 -0500 Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > TZ> Also you may be interested in http://www.couchbase.org/membase which > TZ> speaks the memcached protocol but is replicated on the backend. I > TZ> haven't used it so I can't say if it will be useful to you, but I'd > TZ> like to know who has. There's also, more recently, the Couchbase > TZ> 2.0 server http://www.couchbase.org/get/couchbase/2.0.0 which "is a > TZ> distributed, document-oriented NoSQL database system that unites the > TZ> simplicity and reliability of CouchDB, with the performance of > TZ> Memcached and elasticity of Membase technology" according to their > TZ> page. As with plain Membase, I don't know much about it but would > TZ> love to know if others here have compared it with plain memcached. > TZ> It seems like a decent product and has a community edition... > > No one here has tried Membase or Couchbase? That's surprising. I am > interested in them as compared to plain memcached so I hope this is the > right place to discuss them. > > Ted >
