whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat the hell are you talking abouuuuuttttt??? It's not a problem! The twemcache people are inept and arrogant at communicating what the fuck their thing does!
It's a *small* amount of memory. Don't go trying to solve problems because of a fucking bulletpoint line item in a piece of software. Solve problems you actually see and actually have. Like if you run out of fucking memory due to having 100,000 active sockets on your host. If you don't have that, don't worry about it. You'll be fine. On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Roberto Spadim wrote: > i think it's a normal problem in any tcp/ip unix/socket daemon... don't have > ram? add swap... it's a hardware limit not a software limit...maybe > instead of 'use swap' we could add a 'more than xMB use disk instead of ram', > but you will get into a problem of disk latency, etc... it's like any > database writing temporary query results in memory and after a limit put the > result in disk instead of a memory result > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
