On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 22:46:23 -0800, Chris Goffinet wrote: > The mutex part is handled right now using the threads code, every item > allocation has a mutex around it, so this should be safe by calling > inside the item_allocation. > > Right now every item does have its own cas id. If you propose the > following scenario: > > set foo -> id 0 > gets foo -> id 0 > delete foo > set foo -> id 0 > cas foo -> sent using 0 > > That would succeed when it should of failed. The second set should of > caused it to be 1.
Good point, understood. -- Tomash Brechko
