Hi!
On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Tomash Brechko wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:51:01 -0800, Brian Aker wrote:
The comment was right, the multiplier was wrong :)
He-he, this didn't occur to me, while it explains a lot.
Well this is why I like reviews, I am just as likely as anyone to mess
something up. I'll change the malloc call to calloc just so that the
code is clear.
You skipped over u_socket[0], but as I'm getting it you are living UDP
for later, so no more questions.
My current plan is:
1) Fix Unix socket support to work side by side.
2) Start on UDP.
Somewhere in this I want to get some feedback on the "multi-storage"
stuff. I see many of the forks that exist happening because of a need
for a different storage means.
BTW if you can resend the patch for your no-op stuff I'd be happy to
review that.
Cheers and thanks!
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
