Good point,Hillel, qt'native app can do a good job than dalvik:)
Now if we turn to TV or STB,the majority of apps would be html5 based. As far as html5 is concerned, what is Mer's advantage over android? 在 2012-1-24 上午11:20，"Hillel Lubman" <[email protected]>写道： > > The simple technical advantage (at least in my view) is that Mer uses native development (C/C++) as a first class citizen, while Android advocates using Java/Dalvik, leaving NDK as a secondary option. Also, Android applications suffer from non being portable, unless Dalvik VM is released for various platforms which is far from reality yet. Qt on the other hand is already ported on a wide variety of platforms (even including Android), and therefore Qt applications are more portable in theory. > > Regards, > > Hillel. > > > On 01/23/2012 10:09 PM, Hui Zhang wrote: >> >> thank Hillel's reply! >> from this point of view,if vendors chose android,they cannot benefit from some efforts of linux community,and so abducted by android in some extent. As far as openness is concerned,Mer is better than android. >> but does Mer have some techinical advantage over android? or just a good replacement for android without any techinical advantage? >> >> >
