Hello again, Maybe I was not very clear. The whole idea of having a "close comitee" design is to prevent from a flood of ideas, and try to design something consistant. Maybe I would have said small comitee, and that I consider that mailing list to be quite adequate for that (but not a forum, for example)
I think that the best words are those coming from Carsten: [11:24] <Stskeeps> ... just as a general comment: discussions are fine but there needs to be people who can put the foot down, even if it's not the democratically correct choice [11:25] <Stskeeps> for design, especially, as everybody has an opinion on that.. Cheers, Lucien Le lundi 24 juin 2013 11:06:35 Filip Kłębczyk a écrit : > W dniu 24.06.2013 08:55, Lucien XU pisze: > > Hello Timur, > > > > That's a very nice project, and you can count me in, both in the design > > process and in the development aspect. > > > > I would just suggest that the designing aspect should be carrired > > carefully, because it is a tricky buisness. There will always be people > > that don't like the design, so we could do that in a slightly more closed > > way (small comitee), or having someone that resolve conflicts in the > > team. > > More closed way? Small, exclusive group? I agree under condition that > you won't be part of it, is that ok? Do you now feel why it as an > "excellent" idea? > > Please explain me why design must be carried in the close way and cannot > be discussed in the open? > > Idea of closed, exclusive groups is always good for those that will be > inside of them, but never for those outside. That is the difference > between inclusion and exclusion, open and closed. > > Regards, > Filip > > PS. Weren't you shouting in the past something about Jolla openning the > whole UI or was that someone else?
