Hello, (resending since this got bounced back)
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Dmitriy Purgin <dpur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I was implementing a directory picker in a Sailfish application > and it has come to my attention that there are two independent > FolderListModels for QML: one ships with Qt [1] and another comes from > nemomobile [2]. They have incompatible API and seem to be developed in > unawareness of its counterpart. I like Nemo version for its extended > functionality like permissions, mkpath and rename but the Qt Labs version > is being shipped by the most prominent Nemo user -- Jolla -- whereas Nemo > version doesn't even appear in Sailfish repositories. > > That being said, I'd like to know whether there's any policy in Nemo > regarding these situations. Should there be any API merge towards > Qt.labs.FolderListModel (which for obvious reasons would be the upstream > version)? > in such cases I would say upstream versions are preferred, additional changes/features should go there. Nemo version doesn't seem to be active anymore judging by the activity in the repo. Best regards, > > Thanks > > Cheers > Dmitriy > > [1] > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtdeclarative/source/96e4f00db3bfd222146780251013501cfdd8baaa:src/imports/folderlistmodel > [2] https://github.com/nemomobile/nemo-qml-plugin-folderlistmodel > -- Valério Valério
