Hello Valerio,

thanks for your reply. I just thought so!

Regards
Dmitriy


2015-01-14 13:34 GMT+06:00 Valerio Valerio <vdv...@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> (resending since this got bounced back)
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Dmitriy Purgin <dpur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Recently I was implementing a directory picker in a Sailfish application
>> and it has come to my attention that there are two independent
>> FolderListModels for QML: one ships with Qt [1] and another comes from
>> nemomobile [2]. They have incompatible API and seem to be developed in
>> unawareness of its counterpart. I like Nemo version for its extended
>> functionality like permissions, mkpath and rename but the Qt Labs version
>> is being shipped by the most prominent Nemo user -- Jolla -- whereas Nemo
>> version doesn't even appear in Sailfish repositories.
>>
>> That being said, I'd like to know whether there's any policy in Nemo
>> regarding these situations. Should there be any API merge towards
>> Qt.labs.FolderListModel (which for obvious reasons would be the upstream
>> version)?
>>
>
> in such cases I would say upstream versions are preferred, additional
> changes/features should go there. Nemo version doesn't seem to be active
> anymore judging by the activity in the repo.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dmitriy
>>
>> [1]
>> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtdeclarative/source/96e4f00db3bfd222146780251013501cfdd8baaa:src/imports/folderlistmodel
>> [2] https://github.com/nemomobile/nemo-qml-plugin-folderlistmodel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Valério Valério
>
>
>

Reply via email to