On 16 oct, 11:29, "Daniel N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Kless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A great point for Merb is the facility to add new > > types. Don't make to loose that feature. > > Merb is not losing any functionality, flexibility or modularity via stack... > It's all still optional... we just filled in the blanks as a suggestion. Sorry! I wanted say DataMapper, not Merb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
