On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Kless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that should be included the dm-more full in merb stack, since > that there are any types very usefull as dm-is_state_machine, dm-is- > versioned, etc. wich have not been included. Or at least it should be > can installed since merb thor file. > > So, the Merb developers could think that only exist the types that are > in Merb stack. A great point for Merb is the facility to add new > types. Don't make to loose that feature. > > Hi Kless,
There are a bunch of gems in dm-more that we decided not to include. The trouble with including dm-more is that it includes a lot of things that we felt were not going to be useful to a bunch of people all the time. We included the ones we felt are the "common" ones. Merb is not fixed to using only the ones that we've included. All merb-stack is is a vaneer on top of merb to help people get up and running with what we consider a good and useful stack. If you want to include dm-more in your application feel free. Just go into config/dependencies.rb and include it in there. done.. Merb is not losing any functionality, flexibility or modularity via stack... It's all still optional... we just filled in the blanks as a suggestion. Hope this clears it up Cheers Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
