Yep! Both ways work but gitignoring gems/gems will keep your repo lighter (if that's important to you). -- Yehuda
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK I get it now. Put gems/ into git but not gems/gems/. > > > On Nov 16, 6:38 pm, "Yehuda Katz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes. You can gitignore gems/gems and use thor:gems:redeploy in your > deploy > > task to rehydrate them on the other side. > > -- Yehuda > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Building my 1st merb app, I ran "thor merb:gem:install" on a few gems. > > > I'm assuming that the stuff that gets put into the gems/ directory > > > with this command are supposed to be added to my application's git > > > repository. Is my assumption correct? > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Yehuda Katz > > Developer | Engine Yard > > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > -- Yehuda Katz Developer | Engine Yard (ph) 718.877.1325 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
