Nice I didn't know that! So the files located in gems/cache are used in the target machine and loaded if bundled?
Thanks, Peter. On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep! Both ways work but gitignoring gems/gems will keep your repo lighter > (if that's important to you). > -- Yehuda > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> OK I get it now. Put gems/ into git but not gems/gems/. >> >> >> On Nov 16, 6:38 pm, "Yehuda Katz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Yes. You can gitignore gems/gems and use thor:gems:redeploy in your >> deploy >> > task to rehydrate them on the other side. >> > -- Yehuda >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > Building my 1st merb app, I ran "thor merb:gem:install" on a few gems. >> > > I'm assuming that the stuff that gets put into the gems/ directory >> > > with this command are supposed to be added to my application's git >> > > repository. Is my assumption correct? >> > >> > > Thanks >> > >> > -- >> > Yehuda Katz >> > Developer | Engine Yard >> > (ph) 718.877.1325 >> >> > > > -- > Yehuda Katz > Developer | Engine Yard > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
