yes, they are called plain old gems ;) Seriously, if the slice layout is too much for you, don't use it. You can define controllers, models, and template paths in a gem that's not technically a "slice".
-Ben On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:37 PM, weepy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to have a 'very-flat' slice ? > > > > On 18 Nov, 20:34, "Michael Klishin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > 2008/11/18 Anselm Hook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > my criticism of slices is that they enforce the mvc folder paradigm > that is > > > so tedious to browse through and create directory and navigation > nightmares > > > - why not conflate the controllers, views and model into a single > folder? > > > > Slices are not components, they are shared applications. They should > > have a full blown MVC layout. > > Components in merb are merb-parts and they work differently. > > -- > > MK > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
