That's a pretty simplistic view of the situation. I think you're overemphasizing the (rather minor, imho) differences in your mind and underemphasizing the philosophical sameness. I'm not downplaying the annoyance of having to change things, but saying that the "learning" is not transferrable is really just not true. -- Yehuda
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Jim Freeze <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, CRS <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Merb is merging, which would be easier/better to go from merb to Rails > >> 3.0, or from Rails 2.0 to Rails 3.0? > > > > I've been into Merb just over a month after coming from Rails. From what > > I've heard, you can go with you're most comfortable with. It's gonna' be > > "footprints in the sand" > > (http://www.frtommylane.com/stories/God/protector/footprints.htm) on > both > > sides, Rails or Merb. > > > > Me? I'm very confident about letting Merb carry me. > > I'm confident I'm going to be writing my own web framework sometime in > the future. > > Seems like if a web project takes more than 2 months, the following > project is using a new framework, so the learning that you can carry > on to the next project is very limited. > > > -- > Jim Freeze > > > > -- Yehuda Katz Developer | Engine Yard (ph) 718.877.1325 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
