the good news is that ActiveRecord and DataMapper both say that they work properly on 1.9.1.
I'm not sure about Sequel but everything with a C extension might be tricky(Mongrel, Nokogiri, action-args/parsetree...) I'll try to give it a try and see if I can collect enough information to help the developers update their gems to support 1.9.1. - Matt On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Yehuda Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no reason Merb 1.0.x could not support Ruby 1.9. We can try and see > what fails on it this week. > -- Yehuda > > 2009/2/1 Jon Hancock <[email protected]> > >> >> Anyone have a guess as to how merb 1.0.x will fair on the release on >> MRI 1.9.1? >> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ >> >> I see that datamapper is moving quickly toward supporting it. It >> would be useful to understand if merb 1.0.x will. As to rails/merb >> 3.0, I have little interest about this at the moment. >> >> thanks, Jon >> >> > > > -- > Yehuda Katz > Developer | Engine Yard > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
