The reason we never released ActionORM is that we were still discussing it internally. It looks like the final conclusion is to have models respond_to? to_active_model, which will return self in the case of AR and DM, and a proxy object in the case of incompatible models. This means that no library actually needs to be part of Rails or Merb itself, but a library might be used by ORMs to help build the proxy object (optionally). I like this approach a lot better because it lets the ORMs and ORM plugins handle returning the right kind of object, and duck-typing is a more rubyish solution as well.
-- Yehuda On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]>wrote: > There isn't much needed to have an adapter ported to activeorm, however > Yehuda just told me yesterday that he's planning to remove the registry > process and slightly change the API to simplify things. I'll let him comment > on that. > > Regarding 1.9 action-args still isn't fully 1.9 compatible, but everything > else is or should be. > > - Matt > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Pavel Kunc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thanks Matt, >> >> I'm for small steps as well and the current most pain is 1.9.1 and >> bundling. I've apps ready to switch for 1.9.1 and running on the edge >> somehow. I'll appreciate any release which brings us closer to the 1.9 >> and fixes bugs. >> >> I've also question about activeorm. I'd like to upgrade merb_sequel to >> work with it, since it seems that merb_helpers now depends on >> activeorm. The datamapper adapter is now ported to the activeorm? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Pavel >> >> On Jun 30, 6:13 pm, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]> wrote: >> > 1.0.12 got pushed: >> http://yehudakatz.com/2009/06/30/merb-vulnerability-fix-1-0-12/ and we >> are >> > working on 1.0.13 with some bug fixes I mentioned earlier. >> > Regarding the router, the best thing to do is to ask Carl. But as we >> > explained we are anyway waiting for the Rails router to be in place so >> we >> > can do an easy migration for Rails3. >> > >> > - Matt >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, SoftMind <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Hi, >> > >> > > I would also like to go as per Matt's plans as discussed on his blog. >> > >> > > My +1 for old plans. >> > >> > > BTW... How far we are now from New Router? >> > >> > > Thanks >> >> > > > > -- Yehuda Katz Developer | Engine Yard (ph) 718.877.1325 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
