What in particular makes it un-ruby-like still? you mean the whole Rails controller DSL glommy stuff specifically or are you talking something else? It's pretty easy to hack on Rails now isn't it? Like replace the bits of crap with bits of yum?
I'm pretty interested in what you have to say. Sorry if I'm dumb. Julian. On 25/05/2010, at 1:29 PM, Daniel N wrote: > If people wanna play with merb then cool. It's not what it was, and the > attempts to move it to rails, while making rails better, have missed the > point of what was attractive to me about it. Rails is still Rails, although > theres some better modularity about it, it's still a very slow moving, very > heavy framework that always feels more like you're using 'rails' than it > feels like you're using 'ruby'. > > I have not committed a line of code to merb since the 'merger'. The > framework is also very much behind the state of the art now. None of the > original core-team are interested in working on Merb anymore, but I'm glad > people are making use of the code that was written. It does seems a bit like > it's trying to push water uphill though. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en.
