Gary Thompson wrote:
Dave,

Here's your rod-bender. From the Austin American-Statesman:
http://cars.statesmanclassifieds.com/autos?property=austin&tp=Austin&temp_type=detail&classification=autos&ad_id=23011098

BTW, here's a 95 E300D also. A much better ride in my opinion:
http://cars.statesmanclassifieds.com/autos?property=austin&tp=Austin&temp_type=detail&classification=autos&ad_id=23140151

While the 124 chassis has won numerous touring car awards and is a delightful highway car, it's ride is not superior to the W140!! The 126 sedan and even the 124 wagon was a better "ride" then the 124 sedan and the W126 was inferior to the W140. The W140 is a GREAT highway car - perhaps the finest Mercedes ever made made according to the OWNERS that I've talked with. If you've driven one that wasn't GREAT, then it was "BROKEN."

Marshall
--
          Marshall Booth (who doesn't respond to unsigned questions)
      "der Dieseling Doktor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'87 300TD 181Kmi,'87 190D 2.5 199Kmi, '84 190D 2.2 227Kmi, '85 190D 2.0 159Kmi, '87 190D 2.5 turbo 234kmi
      Diesel Technical Advisor MBCA, member GWSection
    http://www.dhc.net/~pmhack/mercedes/mbooth1.htm


Reply via email to