Gary Thompson wrote:
Dave,
Here's your rod-bender. From the Austin American-Statesman:
http://cars.statesmanclassifieds.com/autos?property=austin&tp=Austin&temp_type=detail&classification=autos&ad_id=23011098
BTW, here's a 95 E300D also. A much better ride in my opinion:
http://cars.statesmanclassifieds.com/autos?property=austin&tp=Austin&temp_type=detail&classification=autos&ad_id=23140151
While the 124 chassis has won numerous touring car awards and is a
delightful highway car, it's ride is not superior to the W140!! The 126
sedan and even the 124 wagon was a better "ride" then the 124 sedan and
the W126 was inferior to the W140. The W140 is a GREAT highway car -
perhaps the finest Mercedes ever made made according to the OWNERS that
I've talked with. If you've driven one that wasn't GREAT, then it was
"BROKEN."
Marshall
--
Marshall Booth (who doesn't respond to unsigned questions)
"der Dieseling Doktor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'87 300TD 181Kmi,'87 190D 2.5 199Kmi, '84 190D 2.2 227Kmi, '85 190D 2.0
159Kmi, '87 190D 2.5 turbo 234kmi
Diesel Technical Advisor MBCA, member GWSection
http://www.dhc.net/~pmhack/mercedes/mbooth1.htm